Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Race #178 - Cotton Row Run 10k - Huntsville, AL - 05/28/12

This is my third consecutive year of running Alabama's premier 10k road race, the Cotton Row Run. With more than $10,000 in prize money it brings out some of the big boys, and this year's winner was Julius Koskei, a former US National 10,000 meter champion who defied the Alabama heat by running a 29:25. 

I was stuck a little farther back in the pack but did manage to finish 2nd (or was it 3rd?) in the 60-64 age group. Seems like the same thing happened recently at another race (I can't remember which). At the awards ceremony I collected the 2nd place award, and as I write this I'm still listed as 2nd on the awards page, but in the age group listing I'm 3rd. I suspect there was a glitch of some sort and I'm actually supposed to be 3rd so I'll go with that. 

This is one of the most spectacular 10k races you'll ever find, with the atmosphere feeling more like a marathon, with a large expo and lots of people. With the three races combined (10k, 5k, and 1-miler) there are well over 5,000 runners, and the post-race food is the best anywhere. Oh yeah -- pizza, ice cream, and lots more -- all at 8 o'clock in the morning.



It took 178 races but it finally happened: my shoe came untied in the second mile! That probably sounds insubstantial if you're not a runner, but if you're in a race with an untied shoe it's a big problem. Do you keep going and just hope you don't trip, or do you pull off to the side and lose a minute or so of time to tie it and lose all of your momentum? I thought about it for just a couple seconds. With 4 miles left in the race there's no way I'm going to worry about tripping with every step I take, so I made my way over to the side to get out of the way of other runners and re-tied my shoe and got back into the mix as quickly as I could.

About a half mile past the shoe incident was the famous steep hill that everybody talks about in this race. The past two times I've mostly walked it, but on this day one of my race goals was to run it. As I approached the hill I could see that my heart rate was already near the red line stage at around 171 beats per minute and there was no way I could run that hill. No more than 20 feet up I began walking, checking my heart rate every few seconds, and even walking I stayed at around 170 so I basically just walked the entire hill. I did manage to begin running again maybe 30 or 40 feet from the crest and as I made my way down the hill that mercifully follows I managed to pass quite a few of the people who had jogged passed me on the way up. 

In a crowd in the last mile -- I'm 2nd from the left.
One of the things I like about this race is that once you're past the huge hill in the middle of the race, a good portion of the final 3 miles is downhill or at least flat. As you can see from the photo here taken during the last mile of the race, it was crowded from start to finish. Sometimes I've been able to stay ahead of the pack in large races but in this one I always seemed to be surrounded by other runners. No doubt, the farther back you are in a race the more people you have surrounding you, so maybe I need to start getting used to having company.

This race is the final race of the season of the Running Journal Grand Prix and it's the reason I've been coming here for the past three years. I do love the race, but honestly it's a long way from North Carolina so I'd normally opt for something closer to home. Placing in the RJ Grand Prix has become my goal for each of the past three years. I enjoy all of the races. Linda and I have fun traveling around the Southeast. With my job I don't really get any vacation time so these weekend racing trips work out great for us and the Grand Prix circuit gives me a goal to shoot for. This year I was fortunate to win the Grand Masters Championship once again (I also won it two years ago; last year I won the 55-59 age group championship). Since I turned 60 in February I had earned all of my points before that so this race didn't count towards the Grand Masters since it's only for ages 50 through 59. Next year I'll be in the Senior Grand Masters and I might have a harder time winning anything with guys like Butch Holt, Bob Nelson, William Walker, Louis Messina, Jerry Sofley, and Bob Milan all being fast guys from ages 60-69 who might go for it, and that's just the ones I know, so it'll be interesting to see who decides to compete. Since there's quite a bit of traveling involved and some big races close together on the calendar, it's not something that everybody wants to do every year, but I figure I'll keep it up as long as I'm able to stay competitive.

Click Here for Race Results

My Stats:

Time:  45:32 (chip time)
Pace:  7:17
Age Group:  3 of  49
Overall:  164 of 2013
Average Heart Rate:  166
Maximum Heart Race:  181
Age Graded Equivalent Time:  36:35





**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
2 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
2 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
2 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
3 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap! (15 bucks)
0 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
5 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
1 - 14 and under group (1)
1 - 65+ group (1)
1 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
1 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent ($10,000+ for top runners)
2 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
0 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
5 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
1 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
1 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
2 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
2 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
0 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points)
5 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes
2 - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
2 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes  (AL.COM)   (WHNT)

PARKING  (8 possible points)
2 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
0 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
2 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes

OTHER  (5 possible points)
2 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
1 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  79

Race #177 - Belmont Classic 5k - Belmont, NC - 05/26/12

It's Monday morning as I write this so I need to keep it short and sweet in order to get back to my real-life job. For the past three years I've been running a Memorial Day race in Alabama (it'll be race #178) but before I leave town I like to run this one, which is always on the Saturday of Memorial Day Weekend. It's a good race just four or five miles from home and there are always lots of running friends there, which makes it more special.

This is one of the few races I've run every year since I began running, and going back to check how I've progressed over that time could be a little troubling, but it's probably just a dose of reality setting in. At 60 years old I'm a little slower than I was at my peak. Actually the first year I ran it was my slowest time, but at that time I had just been running a few months and was still getting comfortable with racing and learning the basics. The following year (2010) was my fastest and each year since has been a little slower.

2009 -- 22:07
2010 -- 21:07
2011 -- 21:36
2012 -- 21:49

There's not a lot of time to worry about slowing down. I'm just hoping to keep going at whatever speed for however long I can.


Click Here for Race Results


My Stats:

Time:  21:49
Pace:  7:02
Age Group:  1 of  5
Overall:  15 of  244 (6.1%)
Average Heart Rate:  161
Maximum Heart Rate:  174
Age Graded Equivalent Time:  17:32

**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
0 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
2 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
1 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap!
3 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
5 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
1 - 14 and under group (1)
1 - 65+ group (1)
1 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
0 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent (Included $50 gift certificate)
2 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent (Included $10 gift certificate)
0 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
2 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
0 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
1 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
2 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
2 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
0 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points)
0 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes
0 - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
2 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes (Facebook)

PARKING  (8 possible points)
2 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
0 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes (Queen City Timing)

OTHER  (5 possible points)
0 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
0 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  62

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Race #176 - Brooklyn Half Marathon - Brooklyn, NY - 05/19/12

Going into what is one of the most popular races in possibly the most competitive running community in the world I knew I didn't have a chance to place in the top 3 in my age group, so my goal was to finish in the top 10. The New York Road Runners publishes what they call the "Honor Roll" in the big races for those who finish in the top 10 in their age groups. When I ran the Brooklyn Half in 2010 I finished in 7th place in the 55-59 age group and made the 2010 Honor Roll and hoped to do the same this year. I'm now in the 60-64 age group and you'd think it would be a lot easier, but in New York there's not really an easy age group. Add to that the fact that this year's race had more than twice as many finishers (14,168) than the 2010 race (7,015) and I knew it wouldn't be easy.

The weather was just about as perfect as it could be with a temperature of 58 degrees and no wind. My daughter Nicole lives just a mile or so from Prospect Park, where the race begins so there were no worries about how to get there. The NYRR instructions said we should be at the race by 6 a.m. so Nicole got up at 5:30 and we were out the door by 5:40, picking up two of her friends (Alex and Diana) who were also running the race and we were there in plenty of time. I've gotten to know Diana over the last couple years and was happy to get to see her and run with her again. We jogged around a little then took off to the corrals. I was assigned to the 2nd corral and Diana was assigned to the 3rd, and I decided to go back and start with her since that's still pretty close to the front.

Once the race got going things were slow as we waited for the hundreds of people ahead to cross the starting line. We pretty much walked until hitting the starting line at 1:12 into the race. The runners ahead were pretty fast so we didn't really have to worry about a lot of passing or tripping over slow runners. Diana and I stayed together until the 1-mile mark and at that point she felt like she needed to slow down so that was the last time I saw her until after the race.

All week I had a little bit of a cold (or maybe it was allergies) with a runny nose and sore throat and I wasn't sure if it would affect me or not but I felt pretty good. The route had changed some for this year's race and instead of two laps around Prospect Park, which contains one long hill (I forget the exact distance but maybe as much as a mile), this year the route only included one lap around the park.

I don't ordinarily look at my splits, but since there are clocks at every mile it's only natural to do a little math as you're running along. I hit the 5k mark at around 23:00, which I thought wasn't bad considering the slow start. At the 10k mark I was at about 46 minutes. I crossed the 10-mile mark at almost exactly 1:13:00, which was perfect for me considering the lost minute at the beginning of the race.

As I usually do when I hit the 10-mile mark in a half marathon, I start thinking in 5k mode since I have 3.1 miles left to go. I'll add 30 minutes to my current time and use that as my worst case scenario, assuming that I've completely blown up and will run the last 3 miles at a 10-minute pace. Fortunately that hasn't happened but you never know when it might. So adding 30 to 1:12 gave me a 1:42, which barring anything tragic I should be able to beat. This time around I felt good and knew that those last 3 miles on Ocean Parkway heading to Coney Island are completely flat. I ran the last 3 miles at a good pace for me (7:09, 7:03, and 6:57) with the 6:57 in the 13th mile being my third fastest mile in the race. In the end I made the 2012 Honor Roll by finishing in the age group and was one of only two people from North Carolina making the Honor Roll, with the other being Aaron Linz, president of the Charlotte Running Club, who smoked the course with a time of 1:14:15, fnishing 38th overall out of 14,168 finishers!


Click Here for Race Results


My Stats:

Time:  1:34:00
Pace:  7:11
Age Group:  6 of  130  (4.6%)
Overall:  1,079 of  14,168  (7.6%)
Age Grade Percentage:  77.88%
Age Graded Equivalent Time:  1:16:03





**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
2 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
2 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
2 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
1 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap!
0 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
5 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
0 - 14 and under group (1)
1 - 65+ group (1)
1 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
0 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
2 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
0 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
3 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
2 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
1 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
2 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
0 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
2 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
2 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points)
5 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes
0 - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
0 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes

PARKING  (8 possible points)
0 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
0 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
0 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
0 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
2 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes

OTHER  (5 possible points)
0 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
1 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  63

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Race #175 - Beach Blast 5k - Albemarle, NC - 05/12/12

It's a little bit of a drive to Albemarle so we don't get over there as often as we would like, but it's always fun to run a Vac & Dash race. For the uninitiated, Vac & Dash is a store in downtown Albemarle that sells, you guessed it, vacuum cleaners and running gear. That may sound like an odd combination, and it really is, but thanks to owner Peter Asciutto's outgoing personality, ingenuity, and unique perspective on how to organize a race, Albemarle's running community is one of the largest and most enthusiastic you'll find anywhere.

 Never mind the fact the Albemarle is a couple hundred miles from the beach. We're approaching summertime, which is beach season, so I'll just guess that's the reasoning behind the name. It's probably best not to try to over-think these things.



After my less-than-stellar showing in last week's race I decided last Sunday that I needed to lose weight. Instead of Weight Watchers this time around I thought I'd take the free route and go with Calorie Count, which is a great online program that doesn't cost anything and works beautifully. Of course, like any diet plan, it only works if you do the things you're supposed to do, and that's where I generally trip up. This time though I managed to stick with it all week. I ate less than 2,000 calories each day and didn't eat extra because of running, and by the end of the week I had lost 5 pounds, going from 152 to 147. With two big races coming up in the next two weeks I know that the only way to do well is to drop those extra pounds I've been carrying for the past six months. So far, so good, and now that I'm on a roll I plan on sticking with it until I get back down to my optimum weight of 140 pounds.

The first two miles of the race were tough, with a gradual series of uphill climbs of varying degrees. Fortunately, the last mile paid us back for all of that climbing with a lot of downhill. If I get to choose (and I rarely do), I prefer the uphills to be in the first part of the race and the downhills in the last half, so it worked out well for me.





Two weeks ago I ran two 5k races: the Cherry Blossom 5k (21:57) on Friday night and the Bulldog 5k (21:20) on Saturday morning. Having lost 5 pounds this week my main goal was to run in under 21 minutes. I crossed the finish line today at 20:58, and I'm pretty sure the improved time is the result of losing the 5 pounds. I'm hoping that when (and if) I lose the other 5 pounds my 5k times will dip back down to the range of 20:30 or so.


Click Here for Race Results


Click Here for 400+ Free Photos on Facebook (Vac & Dash page)


My Stats:

Time:  20:58
Pace:  6:46
Age Group:  1 of  9
Overall:  19 of  420



**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
0 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
2 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
2 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
1 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap!
3 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
5 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
1 - 14 and under group (1)
1 - 65+ group (1)
0 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
0 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
2 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
2 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
2 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
1 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
1 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
1 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
1 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
2 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
2 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric (had to register in advance)
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points)
5 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes  ------> 400+ free pics!
5 - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
2 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes

PARKING  (8 possible points)
2 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
0 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes

OTHER  (5 possible points)
0 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
0 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  77


Saturday, May 5, 2012

Race #174 - New River Half Marathon - Todd, NC - 05/05/12

Being a glutton for punishment, I was elated to hear the alarm go off at 3 a.m. Saturday morning. It wasn't so much the early wake-up time -- I try to get up a 4 a.m. every morning anyway. The day's punishment that I eagerly anticipated was the 13.1 miles of hills at the New River Half Marathon. I ran this race last year and it was my slowest half marathon of the year out of 13 that I ran. I remembered that there were hills but I don't think I appreciated the magnitude of the hills. There are a couple of 300-foot climbs as well as a couple of 100-foot climbs, and since I do very little hill training the results are just about what you would expect. I've always been a proponent of the run/walk method and used to incorporate regular walk breaks in every race. Over the past couple years I've mostly stopped doing that, instead trying to run the entire race without any walk breaks, at least most of the time. This race is an exception to the rule though. Last year I walked a considerable amount and this year I did the same. As you can see by the downward spikes on the chart that represent walk breaks (because of the slower pace) I walked about 15 times in this race, and so many times on the last hill that I couldn't distinguish where one stopped and another started.



This was an unusual race for me in that it was the first time I had ever started near the back of the pack at the beginning of the race. Usually I line up near the front and take off fast -- always faster than I should according to most people. The result is that I slow down and get passed by a lot of people that I left near the starting line. The theory I'd heard was that if I would start off slowly and gradually build up my speed, then I'd have much more left for the end of the race. It sounds logical and since I didn't have any great aspirations for today's race I thought it would be a good time to try it. Looking back now after the fact, it did work out pretty much the way it should.

I did some calculations that I don't want to bore you with, but the bottom line is that I ran the first three miles 3 minutes and 16 seconds slower than I did in last year's race. I did indeed have some extra steam in the last three miles and ran those last three miles 3 minutes and 20 seconds faster than the previous year. I actually did feel better in those last three miles this year, and the slower miles at the beginning felt good as well. As a matter of fact, being able to pass hundreds of people gradually over the first few miles after starting in back was kind of fun.






There were a couple of drawbacks that I encountered with this experiment though, and I think I'll go back to my previous way of doing things. The first problem is that even though it was fun to pass all of those hundreds of people, it took a lot of jostling around left and right to pass people. There was a bigger problem though: after starting out slowly I never really seemed to build up enough steam to get to what I think of as my cruising range -- the heart rate I normally build up to in a race and try to hold it throughout. No doubt my actual pace gets slower but most of the time I'm able to hold that same heart rate. In this race after starting with such a low heart rate for a couple miles I never really got into that zone.

One other consequence of starting in the back of the pack is that I ended up crossing the starting mat 38 seconds after the race began. At the awards I was named as winning 1st place in my age group. Looking at the results now though I'm listed in second place. Even though my chip time was 1 second faster (1:46:36) than the person listed in 1st place (1:46:37), his gun time was faster than mine by 35 seconds. Theoretically at least, if I had started up where I normally do and ran the same race I might have won by a second or two. You never know, and it doesn't matter a lot, but you can be sure that in the future I'll be up front. And just for the record, I do agree that the results should be by gun time and not chip time, so if there is a contest between two people, especially in the same age group, they are going head-to-head at the finish line.


Click Here for Race Results

Click Here for Photos from HD Elite Photography


My Stats:

Time:  1:46:36 (chip time)
Pace:  8:12
Age Group:  2 of  10  gun time  (1 of  10 chip time)
Overall:  40 of  477



**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
2 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
0 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
1 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap!
3 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
0 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
1 - 14 and under group (1)
0 - 65+ group (1)
1 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
0 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
1 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
0 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
2 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
1 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
2 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
1 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
2 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
0 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points)
5 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes
5 - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
0 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes

PARKING  (8 possible points)
2 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
2 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes

OTHER  (5 possible points)
0 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
0 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  65

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Race #173 - Bulldog 5k - Charlotte, NC - 04/28/12

After having run a 5k only about 12 hours before this one I wasn't quite sure if I wanted to submit myself to that first mile torture again or not, but I figured what the heck... the weather's nice so I may as well take advantage of it. Like many springtime Saturday mornings, there were races all over the place. I'd heard about the Bulldog 5k and it looked like a good race so that's where I landed. Linda decided to sleep in and let me fly solo since she ran the Friday night 5k.

As soon as I arrived and hopped out of the car I saw Aaron Linz, the president of the Charlotte Running Club. We talked a minute or two. I had seen on Facebook that he was the overall winner of the Waxhaw Town & Country race on Friday night and he was coming over to see if he could string together two wins in a row. A few minutes later I saw Alejandro Arreola, one of my favorite fast guys and last year's Running Journal Grand Prix Open Champion. He introduced me to Megan Lordi, a fast chick but who was at the race only to take a few pics and puppysit while Alejandro ran the race. Other than that I didn't know anybody at all at the race although I did meet a couple of nice people, which is one of the reasons that races are so much fun.



This is a fairly large 5k -- 455 finishers this year -- with many more kids than grown-ups. The race is held at St. Matthew Catholic School and I'm sure it's a big school event so there are kids everywhere. As usually happens in a race full of kids, as soon as it starts there are legs and arms flying all over the place with kids zigzagging in and out. I love to see kids running so I don't mind, but I do try to take some extra caution so that I don't get tangled up in the free-for-all for the first quarter mile or so. After that things tend to calm down as most of the sweaty, red-faced young'uns run out of gas and realize they've started out just a little too fast.
Thanks to Megan for the photo!

In the end, the only two people I knew at the race -- Aaron and Alejandro -- finished 1st and 2nd respectively in the race. I was 24th overall, but more importantly, 37 seconds faster than the previous night so I felt pretty good about that. The 1st place age group award included a $20 gift certificate at Omega Sports, one of the race sponsors. As more and more trophies and other awards end up in boxes in the garage I've come to appreciate winnings such as money and gift certificates much more in races.


Click Here for Race Results


Click here for Official Race Website


My Stats:

Time:  21:20
Pace:  6:52
Age Group:  1 of  3
Overall:  24 of  455

**************************************
* RACE RATING  (100 Possible Points) *
**************************************

Note: With my new rating system (started in December 2011) there's not a chance of any race scoring near 100. If it's important to you, look at each individual category to see how points were earned (or not). Just trying to be more objective with the details. I generally like all of the races I run. If there's something that really rubs me the wrong way I'll mention it in the summary above.

RACE COURSE  (20 possible points)
3 - Chip Timing: (3 points if yes)
0 - Starting Mat: (2 points if yes)
2 - Water Stops: (at least 1 for 5k, 2 for 10k, 4 for half marathon) (2 points)
1 - Course Marking:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Course Scenery:  (0)bad  (1)good
1 - Mile Markers: (0)poor or none  (1)normal  (2)with clocks or time called out
2 - Volunteers:  (0)too few  (2)good
2 - Finish line: (0)mediocre  (2)pretty good to excellent
2 - Certified Course: (0)no  (2) yes
2 - Correct Distance: (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Partly or fully on unpaved roads:  (0)yes  (1)no

REGISTRATION  (6 possible points)
1 - Cost:  (0)expensive  (1)reasonable  (3)cheap!
3 - Race Day Registration:  (0)no  (3)yes

RESULTS  (3 possible points)
2 - Posted promptly online:  (0)no  (2)yes
1 - Clear link on website:  (0)no  (1)yes

AGE GROUPS  (13 possible points)
2 - 3 deep awards: (2)yes (0 for anything less)
5 - 5-year age groups (5 points) (0 for anything less)
1 - 14 and under group (1)
1 - 65+ group (1)
1 - 70+ group (1)
1 - Top Overall M/F:  (0)none or first only  (1)top 3 or better
1 - Masters Category(40+): (0)no  (1)yes
0 - Grand Masters Category (50+):  (0)no  (1)yes

AWARDS  (9 possible points)
2 - Overall Winner Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
2 - Age Group Awards: (0)none  (1)yes  (2)excellent
0 - Door Prizes or Drawing: (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Finisher Medals for All Finishers: (0)no  (1)yes  (3)really cool medals

POST RACE  (7 possible points)
2 - Food for Race Participants: (0)none  (1)some  (2)adequate  (5)a feast!
0 - Entertainment:  (0)no  (1)yes
1 - Finisher times posted after race:  (0)no  (1)yes

REST ROOMS  (4 possible points)
0 - Porta Potties:  (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful
2 - Indoor Restrooms: (0)no  (1)limited, long lines  (2)plentiful

T-SHIRTS  (8 possible points)
2 - T-Shirts: (0)no  (2)yes
2 - Design: (0)not good  (1)not bad  (2)nice
0 - Material: (0)cotton  (2)technical fabric
0 - Discount for no-shirt option:  (0)no (2)yes

PHOTOGRAPHY  (12 possible points) (May revise this later)
0 - Professional Photography: (0)no  (5)yes
x - Prices: (0)expensive  (2)reasonable  (5)cheap!
0 - Free Photographs (newspaper, etc.):  (0)no  (2)yes

PARKING  (8 possible points)
2 - Close to Start:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Close to Finish:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Plenty of spaces:  (2)yes  (0)no
2 - Free Parking:  (2)yes  (0)no

WEBSITE  (5 possible points)
2 - Dedicated race website (0)no  (2)yes
1 - No dedicated site but separate page on other site (organization, running store, etc):  (0)no  (1)yes
2 - Results or link to results posted on website:  (0)no  (2)yes

OTHER  (5 possible points)
2 - Shelter from Inclement Weather (needed or not): (0)no  (2)yes
0 - Swag (free socks, water bottles, etc.): (0)no  (1)yes, some  (2)excellent
0 - Part of race series or Grand Prix:  (0)no  (1)yes


TOTAL:  64